In pandemic times, what do you do when a hungry man orders a meal at a café, and after finishing it, runs away without paying the bill? Or a couple who steal baby diapers from the supermarket? Or a family evicted for not paying the rent breaks in into a vacant house, and lives there illegally? How do you classify their crimes? How long should their sentences be? These are not hypothetical questions for a philosophy student. On Saturday, residents of California are required to vote on them.
*****
The world knows about the Trump-Biden election. But
that is one among many. On Saturday, 3 November, American citizens in
California are asked to vote 16 times. To be precise, four of them are
elections. From among the choices, the Californian voters will vote for: 1. President
2. House of representatives 3. State assembly and 4. Senate. In addition, they
will answer 12 referendum questions, called propositions 14-25. Each
proposition, as a rule, requires a yes/no answer. Today, I will talk only about
proposition 20.
*****
The supporters of Proposition 20 call it the “Reducing
Crime and Keeping California Safe Act”.
Technically, thefts are classified into misdemeanors and
felonies. Misdemeanors are non-violent, less serious. The amount stolen also
plays a part. Stealing diapers from the shop would be a misdemeanor. Felony is
a more serious crime, and accordingly gets a longer sentence.
USA has a legal distinction between prisons and jails.
A prison, usually operated by a state or the federal government, holds people
for longer periods of time, sometimes for years. A jail is operated by a local
government, and holds people for a shorter duration. Jails host people with
short sentences, as well as detain accused before trial or conviction. Thieves
convicted of misdemeanor would normally land in jails.
Proposition 20, the tough-on-crime bill, wants to
elevate certain non-violent thefts, currently misdemeanors, to be charged as
felonies, no matter how little was stolen. It also creates two new crimes – “serial
theft” and “organized retail theft”, that could be charged as felonies, and
punished with imprisonment up to three years.
*****
California, America’s most populous state, has
overcrowded prisons. Ten years ago, the US Supreme Court expressed its
displeasure at the way prisoners were treated in California. Prisons held
nearly twice the maximum capacity. Some inmates were placed in “telephone-booth
size cages without toilets”. A day wouldn’t pass without a prisoner dying in a
Californian jail. The enraged Supreme Court asked the state to find ways to
reduce the prison population, or the Court would be forced to order release of
a certain number, the Court threatened.
The reforms began with change in legislation in 2011,
called “realignment”. It shifted the responsibility for non-serious,
non-violent, non-sexual offenders from state prisons to local jails. This was
the first building block for later reforms.
Proposition 47 (2014) converted many felonies into misdemeanors.
For drug possession or shoplifting below $900, one could no longer be a felon. A
new measure allowed the inmates to apply for rehabilitative programs, and also
request the parole board to release them early. The release was not guaranteed,
but the parole board could examine the context and the prisoner’s conduct. This
enabled thousands to cut short their sentences.
Another proposition, Proposition 57 (2016) changed the
state constitution and made concessions to inmates convicted of non-violent felonies.
*****
Proposal 20 (2020) is in essence a bill to reverse the
work done in the past ten years on prison reforms in California. Tomorrow, I will
present views of the ‘yes’ and the ‘no’ campaigns.
अजून काय काय होणार आहे देव जाणे
ReplyDeletewhy does everything seem to be going backwards?
ReplyDelete