When a country (USA) is losing many
billions of dollars on trade with virtually every country it does business
with, trade wars are good, and easy to win. Example, when we are down $100
billion with a certain country and they get cute, don’t trade anymore-we win
big. It’s easy. –a Trump tweet, 2 March, 2018.
When voters with no knowledge of
economics elect a ruler equally ignorant in economics, they dig their own
grave. It is all right for them to not know philosophy, theology or zoology.
But economics? Economics shapes our daily life. Economists playing politics are
bad enough, but politicians playing economics cause disasters.
Donald Trump started a trade war
with China last year, and accelerated it this month. USA imports a lot more
from China than China imports from the USA. Economists will tell you there is
nothing intrinsically wrong with this, but the deficit gives Trump an
inferiority complex. The solution, conceived by his infantile mind, is to impose
import duties. On 10 May, he raised import duties to 25% on $200 billion worth
of products imported from China. Mathematically, the US government will collect
$50 billion (25% of $200 billion) in duties. Where does this money come from?
Trump won’t admit it, but the
money comes from Americans. American importers and American consumers pay the
duties, not the Chinese. Since the start of the tariff war, washing machines
have become 12% more expensive. All steel products have become 9% dearer. So
far, the American consumers have paid $5.6 billion to the Trump coffers. Why
can’t the Chinese share the burden? Let’s look at the i-phone caste-study to
find the answer.
I-phone
The components of the i-phone are
sourced from different parts of the world. The final assembly takes place in
China. Technically, when the final product is shipped from China to the USA, it
will be a ‘made in China’ product, and in future Trump may charge 25%
duties on it. (Not yet).
Now look at the slide giving the cost break-up of the
i-phone. Nearly 30% of the cost is incurred in the USA and 30% in Japan. China
contributes only $8.50 out of the $240 cost of the i-phone 7. (Don’t get
shocked at the margins Apple takes, you may have paid $1000 for the same
phone). If Trump were to charge 25% on the $240 i-phone from China, the
importer will pay $60 at the USA customs. China, providing only the battery and
labour for assembly, is in no position to pay anything more. Tim Cook, Apple’s
CEO has already clarified that in such a situation Apple will need to move
production out of China. Why not move it back to America? That is what Trump
wants anyway.
Global supply chains
Let me offer another example of a
global supply chain I am more familiar with. Russia has large reserves of
diamonds. Yakutia, a Russian republic, produces 99% of the Russian diamonds and
25% of the world diamonds. The raw diamonds from Yakutia are transported to
Moscow, 8000 km away. At a monthly auction in Moscow, those uncut diamonds are
bought by Indian businessmen from Surat. The auctions have been conducted uninterrupted
under Stalin, Brezhnev, Gorbachev, Yeltsin and Putin. (Diamonds last longer than any political
ideology).
After the auction, the diamonds
travel another 6000 km to Surat, a city in central India. For the past seventy
years, Surat is the world’s largest center for cutting and polishing diamonds.
80% of the world’s diamonds are polished here. Some Surat factories have more
than 30,000 workers. It is not uncommon to find three generations from a family
devoting their career to diamond polishing.
The polished diamonds, the smooth
gems, now travel another 8000 km to Antwerp, Belgium. The gems you see on New
York’s Fifth Avenue have further travelled 8000 km from Belgium. In short, the
Yakutia-Moscow-Surat-Antwerp-New York journey covers 30,000 km and four
countries. Can the process be made more efficient?
The cost of labour in Surat,
despite the singular expertise of the diamond polishers, is fairly low. It is
unlikely any other country will be able to match it. But more important is the
expertise accumulated over seventy years. Moscow auctions, Surat polishing, and
Antwerp distribution are functions in which the respective geographies have specialized.
They have built the necessary infrastructure and staff. Politicians - nationalists
and populists – want to build walls, break unions and bring back jobs, but they
forget supply chains are no longer local. They are global and complex, with
each place playing a specialized role.
It’s the same with China. China
has specialized as a manufacturing hub for the world. USA, in the last 20 years,
has lost one third of its production capacity, shut 90,000 factories, and got
rid of 5 million manufacturing jobs. It is estimated that all existing tools
and die-makers in the USA can be collected in a small room, whereas in China
they will require hundreds of football fields.
USA can’t match the Chinese
costs. Foxconn is Apple’s partner in China. At the Foxconn factory, there are
regular reports of workers committing suicide due to low wages. Even if costs
are ignored, there isn’t enough expertise in the USA to replace the Chinese
production.
Stealing intellectual property
Trump
also accuses China of stealing America’s intellectual property. The daylight robbery
has been going on for three decades.
This is
a legitimate grievance. However, much of this stealing happens contractually.
Chinese legislation demands technology transfers or obligatory joint ventures
for foreign partners. If the USA benefits from cheap Chinese labour and mass
production, that is a price it has to pay. In any case, the Chinese engineers are
intelligent enough to discover what others invent through reverse
engineering.
I am
writing these words on my Dell laptop with Microsoft office installed and Google
as a screensaver. I communicate with friends and foes through gmail and
facebook, order things on amazon, run in Nike shoes, shave with Gillette, book
Uber on i-phone, wear Gap jeans, drink chilled water from a Whirlpool fridge
and bank with CITIBANK. In what way is the American intellectual property
damaged? And if counterfeiting by Chinese is as rampant as claimed by the
Americans, how have the earnings and profits of the top American companies
risen consistently?
War is
a two-way process
In any
war, the attacked side needs to retaliate. Because it also has its dignity.
China has launched import duties on American products. The Chinese have to
scratch their heads because they have such a massive trade surplus, there aren’t
enough American goods to tariff. As part of its retaliation, China stopped
buying Soybeans from the USA. The American farmers, most of them Trump voters,
were shocked. China must be punished through heavy import duties, but how can
they stop buying soybean from us? The angered farmers have lobbied Trump, and
Trump has now promised to pay $ 12 billion to them. In effect, the American
consumers will pay $ 12 billion to the American farmers. This is what happens
when protectionism triumphs over market economy.
China
is not bound by market economy, or fluctuating currency or human rights. The
American-Chinese trade war is, therefore, uneven to start with. Trump’s
protectionism has repercussions everywhere in the world. The stock markets
react with sharp falls. Like in any major war, Trump expects allies to dance to
his tune. All US allies must now ban Huawei because the USA considers it dangerous
for its security. And if they don’t, suitable punishment will be prescribed for
them.
The Third
World War has started. Those not conversant with economics will think the WW comparison
exaggerated, until it pinches their personal finances in a big way.
Jews
and Chinese
Surprisingly,
there is little difference in what Hitler said before the Second World War, and
what Trump is saying now.
Hitler: “The
Jews have shown real genius by profiting from politics…. Once I really am in
power, my first and foremost task will be the annihilation of the Jews.”
Trump: “We
can’t continue to allow China to rape out country, and that’s what they’re
doing. It’s the greatest theft in the history of the world.” “… There will be nobody left in China to do business
with. Very bad for China, very good for the USA! But China has taken so advantage
of the U.S. for so many years, that they are way ahead….” Trump
Tweet, 13 May, 2019.
Trump is
ignorant not only of economics, but also demographics. Hitler had only 18 million
Jews to deal with. China’s population is 1.4 billion.
If this
Third World War is allowed to continue, it will inflict severe damage on
everyone in the world. There won’t be any winners. But Trump, like Hitler, will
go down as the War’s most infamous casualty.
Ravi
No comments:
Post a Comment