A
week ago, on 2 June, a large group of Dutch citizens visited a Rotterdam court.
The group comprised of 22 plaintiffs - 12 adults and the parents of 10
children. The case was launched jointly by Joey Chief, Monique Aarts, Merel-Lotte,
Dr Moniek Wassenaar, Tanja Koopmans and a few others. On 2 June, the Rotterdam
court was expected to deliver the verdict.
Joey
Chief
Joey
Chief, 30, is a sports instructor as well as a manager in a Vodafone shop. He
lives in Den Helder with his partner. Joey is the middle child, with an elder
brother and a younger sister. As a child, he realised he was very different
from his siblings. His brother had learning difficulties. His sister was a
party animal. Joey was of an enterprising nature, at 14 he started giving
lessons at the gym. At 15, he left home.
His
parents told him he was born through IVF. A fertility clinic had used his
father’s sperm to make his mother pregnant. In grade six, he learnt that
despite IVF, he was as natural a child as any.
After
Joey felt attracted to a man (with whom he now lives), he began to wonder once
again why he was so different. In his disturbed state, he began attending counselling
sessions. The psychologist advised Joey to probe the matter of his birth
further with his mother. As recently as on 23 March, 2017 he asked his mother
the details of his conception.
It
was a small clinic, his mother said. The doctor had done his job very well.
Joey’s mother admitted it was not exactly an IVF, but artificial insemination. She
had seen the straws with the seed. The vials were stored in a canister, and the
name of her husband was displayed prominently on it.
Back
in his car, Joey googled the words he had heard from his mother. Barendrecht.
Fertility clinic. Bijdorp. The name of its director. The Google search also
gave the name of Monique Aarts, a woman who had apparently initiated a case in
a Rotterdam court.
Monique
Aarts
Monique
Aarts, 32, was born in a similar way to Joey, with her mother using the
services of a fertility clinic in the Bijdorp section of Barendrecht near
Rotterdam. Monique’s father was found to be infertile. He and his wife agreed
they would meet Dr Jan Karbaat, known as the pioneer in the field of
fertilisation. He was the director of the largest sperm bank in the
Netherlands.
Dr
Karbaat supported them throughout the process. The sperm of an anonymous donor
was used for both Monique and her younger brother. However, the two children
turned out to be different, in looks and in temperament.
In
a casual conversation, Dr Karbaat had said the fertility centre often mixed the
sperms of donors. Mixing the sperms of two or more donors increased the chances
of conception, because it allowed competition between the sperms. It didn’t
mean someone could have two biological fathers, no, that was not possible, Dr
Karbaat had explained, smiling. As soon as a sperm has fertilised an egg,
another sperm can’t enter the same egg. In rare instances, if a woman were to
sleep with two men on the same day, she may conceive twins from two fathers, two
different sperms entering two different eggs, yes that was possible. But still
each child, born naturally or through sperm donation, has only one mother and
one father, not a mixture of fathers. Monique’s mother had not bothered to
share that explanation with Monique.
TheDutch foundation “Donorkind” (donor child) defends the interests and rights of donor
children. It believes those children should have the same rights as naturally
born children. One of these rights is to know your biological parents. Donorkind
has set up a DNA database. A 2004 Dutch law entitles a donor child, on reaching
16, to trace its roots, to identify the anonymous father. However, children
born before 2004 have no such legal privilege. Donorkind helps these children
by comparing their DNA with the DNA of other children who may have been fathered
by the same donor. Similarly, if a donor father is courageous enough to send
his DNA to this foundation, the children can contact him - their biological
father. However, many sperm donors are reluctant to announce themselves, because
they fear their children may claim inheritance.
Monique
decided she and her brother should send their DNA to Donorkind. To find their
father. If not, possibly a half-brother or half-sister. The DNA tests were
expensive, but Monique decided it was worth it.
“I
am a little confused.” The doctor who had conducted the tests said to Monique.
“You said you and your brother want to find your father.”
“Yes”
said Monique. ‘We want to send those results to Donorkind. They compare our DNA
with their database. We may find our father, or maybe someone else who has the
same father.”
“I
understand. But I’m afraid you and your brother don’t share a common father.
The test is very clear. You have a common mother, but different fathers.”
Monique’s
brother, or as it turned out her half-brother, went into depression. He often
sits with the DNA results, staring blankly at the pages from the clinic.
Monique went ahead and sent her results to Donorkind. To her surprise, she
found four women who had the same father as she. She met two of them - her
half-sisters. Monique realised she may have many half-siblings but no full
brother or full sister.
Merel-Lotte
Merel-Lotte,
23, was one of the half sisters Monique had met. Merel-Lotte’s mother Esther
Heij, 57, is a disabled person. After a few failed pregnancies, her husband and
she had divorced. At 32, she wanted children badly. After failing to find
another husband or lover, she turned to the clinic of Dr Karbaat. She needed an
anonymous donor. However, she made the doctor promise that on reaching 16, the
child would learn the donor’s identity. This would be done through the donor
passport maintained by the sperm bank.
Every
time Esther Heij visited the clinic for artificial insemination, she needed to
wait. Dr Karbaat was proud his clinic supplied “fresh seed”, not frozen sperm lying
in vials. Esther often felt curious about the anonymous man in some other room
of the clinic donating his fresh semen. A possible father of her future child, but
she never saw any such donor. She quite understood the need for the clinic to
maintain a donor’s anonymity.
The
exercise was expensive, costing 1000 guilders per donation. Indeed, after a few
unsuccessful attempts, Merel-Lotte was born. When she reached 16, Esther wrote
to Dr Karbaat requesting the details of the donor as was agreed. The Karbaats
were on vacation. After a few weeks, Merel-Lotte got the information about her
anonymous father on an A4 page. He was slim, fair, blue-eyed, optimistic, lover
of camping and nature, hated dishonesty and had a happy childhood. The clinic
regretted the man hadn’t left his name. (It wasn’t a legal requirement before
2004 to take down names).
What
struck Merel-Lotte in the description were the blue eyes. Her eyes were brown
with no trace of blueness.
Dr
Moniek Wassenaar
Moniek
Wassenaar, 36, is a psychiatrist. As a teenager she learnt sperm donation was
the source of her birth. Since then, she was keen to find her nameless
biological father. In 2010, a newspaper article had appeared with her photo
alongside. The article mentioned Dr Moniek Wassenaar was looking for her donor
father.
In
a few days, a reader wrote to her. He said she bore an uncanny physical similarity
to a gentleman he knew. The letter mentioned the address. Moniek decided to
make a visit.
On
the morning of 7 Jan. 2011, Moniek reached the address. It was a stately yellow
brick house in the Bijdorp section of Barendrecht near Rotterdam. It used to be
a sperm bank but the government had shut it down in 2009. The door was opened
by Mrs Karbaat. Dr Moniek introduced herself and said she wished to see Dr Jan
Karbaat. Moniek thought Mrs Karbaat looked reluctant to call her husband out,
but she eventually did.
Dr
Jan Karbaat, 84 years old, came out and shook hands with Moniek. “If you plan
to have a child, sorry, our sperm bank is now closed.”
Moniek
looked at Dr Karbaat in disbelief. Both of them had large teeth and mouths, a
high forehead, high cheekbones and droopy eyelids. She marvelled at nature’s
ability to clone features from a parent into a child.
“My
mother had a fertility treatment in your clinic, doctor. I believe you are my
biological father.”
Dr
Karbaat narrowed his eyes. “Let me see your hands” he said. On examining the
large hands, he said. “You could be a kid of mine.”
Moniek
then requested Dr Karbaat to agree to a DNA test. The test would confirm the
relationship.
“Why
would I do that?” Dr Karbaat said. “To organise a family Christmas party?” He
went on to say he has fathered at least 60 children by giving his own sperm. “What’s
wrong with it? I am in good health and intelligent. I can certainly share my
genes with the world. It’s a noble thing.” (As per records revealed by the case,
Dr Karbaat was 81 years old, when he fathered his latest child).
Dr
Moniek cordially ended the meeting with her presumed father. However, she understood
he didn’t wish to see her ever again.
The
case against Dr Karbaat
In
2015, Dr Moniek learnt from Monique Aarts that several children similarly
suspected Dr Karbaat to be their father. The Karbaat clinic, the country’s
biggest sperm bank, was shut down for falsifying data and analyses, fictitious
donor descriptions and exceeding the permitted limit per donor. Dr Jan Karbaat
had often swapped the donor’s sperm with his own to fill the Netherlands with
his DNA.
Moniek
Wassenaar said, “I fear I’m his daughter, and hope I’m not. A DNA test will
make it certain. It’ll be sad to learn I’m a crook’s daughter, but at least
this uncertainty would end.”
Tanja
Koopmans, mother of the 18-year old Gioachino, said, “I feel like Dr Karbaat
raped me.” That sentiment was echoed by many mothers, who were given false
descriptions of imaginary donors.
Monique
Arts had managed to get together 22 plaintiffs. All of them had large teeth and
mouth, a high forehead, high cheekbones and droopy eyelids. The case against Dr
Karbaat was to force him to take a DNA test. Each child was entitled to know
its biological father.
Joey
Chief, Monique Aarts, Merel-Lotte, Dr Moniek Wassenaar, Gioachino Koopmans and
others, their children, were not supposed to exist. (Could they sue Dr Karbaat for
coming into this world with his genes?)
The
case was launched. Dr Karbaat’s lawyer denied any wrongdoing on his part.
Because unless his DNA link to all the children was proven, what crime could he
be charged with?
Before
the trial reached its end, however, in April 2017, Dr Jan Karbaat died at the
age of 89. In his will, he clearly specified nobody should be allowed to take
his DNA in any manner.
2
June 2017
Dr
Karbaat took his crime to his grave. He remained unpunished. That was the
general sentiment among the plaintiffs.
Dr
Karbaat’s toothbrush, nose hair trimmer and compressed stockings are preserved
under a court order. On 2 June, the Rotterdam court ordered that these items
can be used for conducting a DNA test. The court has overruled Dr Karbaat’s
will. However, another court needs to decide whether the results of the DNA
test can be made available to the plaintiffs.
If
and when that happens, the 22 children, their own children, and perhaps many
more children in Netherlands will become 100% certain that they are the off-spring
of a depraved scoundrel.
Ravi
There's so much wrong with this, I don't even know where to start. Literally so many mistakes and untrue statements are made by this writer. Throw the whole thing out. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteMonique