At
the time of writing this story, Indian police in three states are looking for
the High Court Justice Chinnaswami Swaminathan Karnan (hereafter called
“Karnan” to limit the wordcount). Karnan is bald, with a bristled grey
moustache, white religious mark on his forehead, and is usually suited and
booted except in his sleep.
Karnan
has been a HC Judge for eight years, and what an electrifying period of eight
years it has been. In 2011, he formally complained against a fellow judge for
deliberately touching him by foot, because he is a Dalit, a lower caste person.
The upper caste judges always discriminated against him. He would barge into
other court rooms where fellow judges were conducting their cases - Karnan
suspected other judges (upper caste) were given better cases. Angry at the
injustice, he would start shouting and interfering. The upper caste judges
smiled and tolerated it all. Complaining against Karnan could stamp you as
anti-Dalit.
Sex
defines marriage
Karnan’s
judgements were innovative. In June 2013, he pronounced an important moral
verdict. If a man and a woman, both adult and unmarried, have sex, their act of
sexual gratification is a valid marriage under law. Exchanging rings or
garlands, registering the marriage and following religious customs were for the
satisfaction of society. Consummation constituted marriage. Some sections of
media and public, essentially immoral people, protested against the judgement.
Karnan then issued a “gag order”, (a Judge’s prerogative), silencing everyone.
In
late 2014, twenty Madras (Chennai) HC judges wrote a letter to the Supreme
Court. It talked about the anguish and agony suffered by all of them at the
hands of this gentleman. Look, they are all discriminating against me,
harassing me, said Karnan in response.
Boss
is not a superior
In
a few months, Karnan started Suo Motu proceedings against his own boss,
Justice Sanjay Kaul, the Chief Justice of the Madras HC. (Suo Motu is
another privilege of a judge, to begin a case at his own initiative, without a
plaintiff or police). Karnan accused his boss of giving him dummy cases.
Because of his caste. The SC ordered a stay on those proceedings. Infuriated at
the interference, Karnan launched criminal proceedings against the two SC
judges who had ordered the stay. Karnan’s order charged them under the SC/ST
atrocities act. (An act to protect atrocities against lower castes).
Transfer
and cc to all
The
SC deliberated Karnan’s matter for months. Finally, on 12 February 2016, the Chief
Justice of India ordered his transfer from Chennai to Calcutta. During British
days, criminals and political convicts were transferred to the Andaman Islands.
In independent India, unruly judges are transferred to the north-east of India.
All
hell broke loose when Karnan saw his transfer order. How dare anyone transfer
him without his prior consent? Three days later, Karnan issued a judicial order
bringing a stay on the transfer. In his order, he said to the SC, “I am apt
to constrain Your Lordship’s Order after invoking Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, by staying Your Lordship’s tentative recommendation
Order dated 12.02.2016... I request Your Lordship not to interfere in my
jurisdiction...” He also asked the SC to submit a written statement in two
weeks’ time. Karnan sent a copy of his judicial order to the Prime Minister,
President, Law Minister, leaders of all opposition parties and the National
Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (called “SC/ST Commission”
hereafter). He always sent copies of his important orders to prominent politicians
and the SC/ST commission. Karnan was perfectly entitled to it; no law
prohibited sending copies of the order.
The
SC, instead of sending a written explanation as demanded by Karnan’s order, made
all his orders, suo motu or otherwise, null and void. Karnan knew they
had done it because he belonged to a lower caste. Reluctantly, and after wild
protests, he agreed to move to Calcutta. In the Calcutta HC, he became a full-fledged
HC Judge again, capable of passing valid orders. The Madras HC – its judges,
staff and secretaries – threw a grand party to celebrate Karnan’s departure for
Calcutta.
Letter
to the Prime Minister
On
23 Jan. 2017, Karnan wrote an open letter to the Prime Minister of India. The
letter listed 20 corrupt HC and SC judges. He asked the PM to arrange their
interrogation by a central competent agency. For unknown reasons, the PM did
nothing. Karnan didn’t issue any order against the Prime Minister; probably he
wanted to give him some time.
The
SC of India, on the other hand, reacted. It issued a contempt notice against
Karnan, for degrading the judiciary and making allegations of corruption
against SC Judges. In March, the top court issued a warrant against Karnan,
barring him from practicing in the court.
This
was outrageous. Instead of investigating the corruption among the judges, the
whistleblower was about to be punished. This was unacceptable to Karnan. On 16
March, he issued an order asking the SC judges (issuers of the contempt notice)
to pay Rs 14 crore (2 million dollars) for disturbing his mind and normal life.
He ordered the Registrar General of the SC to deduct the amount from the
salaries of each of the accused.
Two
weeks later, the SC wondered, for the first time, if there was something wrong
with Karnan’s mental health. By now, Karnan, unable to work from the court, was
working from his residence in Calcutta. He issued an order summoning the SC
judges to his residence for questioning his mental health.
On
1 May, the SC ordered that a medical team should examine Karnan for any mental
illness. The following day, Karnan issued an order to the Air Control Authority
of India asking it to prevent any of the SC Judges from travelling abroad,
since otherwise they could spread the virus of caste discrimination globally.
On
4 May, the medical team sent by the SC visited Karnan at his Calcutta home (now
also an HC office). Karnan offered them tea, talked as politely as he could,
and despatched them off. By now India’s most recognised judge; TV channels were
vying for his interviews. Karnan soundly argued that the SC erred in sendingthe order to him. If he was mentally ill, (which of course he was not) the
order should be sent to his relatives and not him. In any case, mental illness
has nothing to do with the soundness of a person’s mind, he added.
A
deserving punishment
By
now, Karnan had had enough of the unfair SC. He must give them a deserving
punishment. This week, on Monday, Karnan sentenced J.S.Khehar, the Chief
Justice of India and seven other SC judges to 5 years of Rigorous Imprisonment
and a fine of Rs 100,000 each. They are charged under the SC/ST (prevention of
atrocities) Act. If the fine is not paid within a week, they will serve another
six months of imprisonment.
Karnan
directed Delhi’s Director General of Police to arrest the SC judges. (The poor man
didn’t know Delhi, unlike other states, has a Commissioner of Police and not
DGP, but that didn’t really matter.) As usual, he sent copies of his orders to
the SC/ST Commission.
Oddly
enough, the SC judges, instead of surrendering themselves, pronounced a
six-month jail for Karnan, and issued a non-bailable warrant. Karnan’s lawyer
argued that next month he turns 62 and is obliged to retire. (Sixty-two is the
retirement age for judges of all castes). That was a reasonable request. Why
send an HC Judge to jail and spoil the reputation of the Indian judiciary, when
a month’s wait can send him to retirement? The unreasonable SC disagreed.
For
the last three days the police have been looking for Karnan in Bengal, Tamil Nadu
and Andhra Pradesh. He is not found. His lawyer, though, has launched a case in
the SC to bring a stay on the order sending Karnan to jail. Unless the SC wants
to engage in discriminatory practices, it must consider Karnan’s appeal.
*****
Analysis
The
inbreeding of Judges
Who
appoints judges? In the USA, we recently saw Trump nominating Neil Gorsuch to
the SC and the senate somehow confirming it. When politicians appoint judges,
can the judges rule against those politicians or their parties? Judges are
human, and unfortunately can suffer from the same biases as all of us do.
Indian judges retire at 62, American SC judges don’t retire, they are in power
until death. The American SC now has 5 conservative and 4 liberal judges. It is
expected that borderline cases will, for the foreseeable future, get
conservative verdicts by a 5:4 vote.
Judges
can also be elected, as in the State Court Judges
in 32 out of 50 states of the USA. Like politicians, those judges need campaign
money, and it is too much to expect them to rule against the sponsors in court cases.
In
India, the judiciary has for long fought against any politician interfering in
the selection process of the judges. India’s finance minister called this ‘the
tyranny of the unelected’. In what is called the Collegium
system, a judicial inbreeding system, judges select judges. After the
Karnan saga, nobody clearly remembered how he was appointed. Karnan was
appointed by three judges. Justice P.K.Mishra apologised for appointing him
without knowing him. The Chief Justice of India then, justice Balkrishnan said:
“Others propose the names, and we go by that. I didn’t make any specific
enquiry about him.” Justice A.K. Ganguly who had proposed Karnan’s name said he
didn’t remember, it was so long ago. He thought for social justice, a Dalit
judge should be part of the HC Judiciary.
India
has fewer than 600 High Court judges and only 31 Supreme Court judges.
That is half a judge for every million. (Or one HC/SC judge per 2 million
Indians). Absolutely no written record is kept of the appointment procedure.
Three judges get together over tea and biscuits, discuss a candidate (like
Karnan) and appoint him. With no checks and balances, the Indian judiciary is
supremely powerful. (Indira Gandhi was convicted by a High Court judge for a minor
misfeasance, causing the Emergency of 1975) And if you criticise the judiciary
too strongly, you may attract contempt charges and go to jail.
Reservation
An
affirmative action (USA) or positive discrimination (UK) is called
“reservation” in India. It is essential to support historically oppressed
sections of society. In India, schedules (lists) of such people are prepared. Castes
and tribes falling into the lists are the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
(SC/ST). Many Indian institutions follow reservations by making entry easy
for the SC/ST candidate, not exit. In other words, an SC/ST candidate
may enter a medical institute with entry standards relaxed. However, he must
study, compete with everyone and qualify to become a doctor just like everyone
else. In critical areas of life, professionals must be selected on merit. A
blind person is handicapped, and deserves sympathy, but he can’t be made a
pilot to show positive discrimination. A High Court judge is a serious
profession capable of affecting the lives of many people. He must be selected
on merit, not on caste. Karnan is not the first or the last SC/ST judge in
India. The others, though, were selected despite their caste, and not because
of it.
The
enigmatic language
Indian
judiciary’s argument about keeping the appointments within a family is that the
Indian politicians are not yet evolved (meaning they are backward). There is some
merit in this argument, since an illiterate Indian can become a member of the
Indian parliament (and many do), age and residence being the only
qualifications. Judges, on the other hand, have a law degree as a minimum.
Reality,
though, shows that the law degree is no evidence of quality education. The legal
profession, just like politics, is not the first choice of the brightest Indian
minds. Second, many of the judgements are so enigmatically written, one wonders
which law colleges teach such creative writing. Look at the following judgement
of a High Court:
“(The)...tenant in the demised premises stands
aggrieved by the pronouncement made by the learned Executing Court upon his
objections constituted therebefore...wherewithin the apposite unfoldments qua
his resistance to the execution of the decree stood discountenanced by the
learned Executing Court”.
Such abstract language is not exceptional, it’s
widespread. The Supreme Court quashed the above verdict, not on any legal grounds,
but by saying they didn’t understand what the HC judge wanted to say. (Compare
this to a beautiful ruling written in plain English with Emoji, web symbols, so
that children affected by the case can read it. http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2016/9.html
. This ruling from last year was written by Mr Justice Peter Jackson from an
English High Court.)
Karnan’s
case makes it imperative to involve people from outside the judiciary in the
selection process. Also, as in any corporation, the process must be transparent
with records maintained in writing.
Why
was Karnan not impeached?
In
theory, an Indian judge can be impeached. But the process is so complicated
that both the houses of Parliament will need to spend days, possibly months,
trying to get the vote through.
In
some countries, buffoons become judges. In some countries, buffoons become
presidents. Until they can be removed after a long struggle, we simply need to
sit back and enjoy the show.
Ravi
No comments:
Post a Comment