We
are all in this together, said Donald Trump. We are all in this together, said
Boris Johnson. Different world leaders said this to their populations in their
respective languages. Why have we never heard this phrase from them in the
past?
When
the wealth, even inherited wealth, of many went up by 28% because of the stock
market boom in 2019, why did nobody say we
are all in this together?
Just
before the Corona crisis, Oxfam issued its annual report which now shows 2153 billionaires
with more wealth than 4.6 billion people. 22 richest men have more wealth than
all the women in Africa. And women’s unpaid
care work is valued at 10.8 trillion USD. Valued but not paid. These reports
with startling facts are issued every year. None of the billionaires has ever said:
‘we are all in this together.’
The
poorest of the world, (even America has at least 40 million people below the
poverty line), have negative wealth. They have debts, not savings. They work for
a meal tomorrow or for a meal today. The only reason they are not called slaves
is because they live in constitutional democracies.
How
can a homeless ‘work from home’? How can fifty labourers sharing a slum-room
keep social distance? How can people wash hands with soap for twenty seconds,
when it’s a struggle to get a bucket of water?
Now
they are locked down, their jobs taken away, wages taken away, but not their
debts, and not their hunger. When from the podium somebody says: We are all in this together, it is
understood we are not. Those speakers want to prevent food riots and political
revolutions in which they or their political careers may get killed, that’s
all. They wish to comfort those who may eventually cause either.
Why
should such slogans appear only in times of crisis? Why can’t we all be
together in times of prosperity? Why not make provisions to prevent food riots
and revolutions?
One
good thing that will come out of this pandemic is to compel nations to
implement the concept of the ‘Universal Basic Income’. More about that
tomorrow.
Ravi